Talk:Mustafa al-Hawsawi

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Adbul Aziz Ali? edit

The article currently states:

It has been suggested that al-Hawsawi may be the same person as Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, or may be an alias of the Pakistani terrorist Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, although this is unclear.

However, these BBC News stories [1] [2] refer to al-Hawsawi and Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali as separate individuals, and identifies al-Aziz Ali as "Amar al-Balochi". I take this to be an alternative transliteration of Ammar al-Baluchi. What is the source for identifying al-Hawsawi as Aziz Ali? Should this sentence be removed from the article? —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 23:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Pending an explanation, I've removed the sentence from the article because it's just too confusing (not to mention uncited, and probably a WP:BLP concern). —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 23:49, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Definitely needs further explanation, but al-Hawsawi used the alias Mustafa Ahmed, which according to the September 24 2001 Newsweek, was the name "somebody" had used to send Marwan and Atta their money -- that "somebody" was later fingered to be al-Baluchi -- but I'm guessing the confusion/theory arises from that fact. It seems worth having, though likely not in the lead, and needs further clarification. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 23:52, 8 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps multiple individuals used the alias "Mustafa Ahmed". But of course we shouldn't speculate in the article, unless we have a reliable source for that speculation (in which case it wouldn't be us speculating, it would be the source speculating and us reporting their speculation). —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 03:20, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree it's probably just a common alias, but since there does seem to be "media confusion" about the four identities, and how many physical people exist, and who used which alias, it seems worth having a note somewhere in the article about it all. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 03:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
That does make sense. I'll leave it in the hands of the experts (which I'm not) — just be careful to avoid original research. Ideally, we should find a source which actually discusses the various aliases, rather than making transitive assumptions. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 06:05, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Allegedly? edit

I'm not familiar with all of the details of his case, so I don't know whether he has (legally) confessed, but it seems that he certainly has not yet been found guilty. So shouldn't wording such as "allegedly" or "accused" be added in several places to this article, including, for example, in the opening sentence that currently states without caveat: "...'is a member of the militant Islamic organization al-Qaeda and an organizer and financer of the September 11, 2001 attacks." Even if it is likely to be the case that he is guilty, and even if he has claimed the above (although as I said, I do not know this), it still seems premature to state as a fact until reasonably proven. (With respect to claims, it is often the case that people or groups try to take credit for the terrorist attacks of others for various reasons.) And if this already has been established, the support for these claims should be cited in this article somewhere. -- 99.231.194.255 (talk) 08:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Mustafa al-Hawsawi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mustafa al-Hawsawi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply