Talk:Music – Songs from and Inspired by the Motion Picture/GA1

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 20:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Basic stuff and comments

edit
  • Improve the image's non-free use rationale with this template.   Done
  • Infobox looks good, but it would be better if the image also had alt text.   Done
  • I would expand the lead a bit to better summarize the entire article.   Done
  • Is the "Songs" header necessary if the other "section" is 1 sentence?   Done
  • "which opens" → "that opens"   Done
  • "which features" → "that features" (both uses)   Done
  • an "massive" → a "massive"   Done
  • Archive sources (either manually or with this tool).   Done
  • The reference after "14 tracks" should not be in all caps per WP:ALLCAPS and WP:SHOUT.   Done
  • References should not be using the "at the Wayback Machine" template. Fix the reference using it.   Done
  • Mark references from Los Angeles Times with "|url-access=limited".   Done
  • Mark references from Rolling Stone with "|url-access=limited".  Done
  • UPROXXUproxx (WP:SHOUT)   Done
  • REVOLTRevolt (WP:SHOUT)   Done

Progress

edit
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  
I will begin making the changes and continuing to do so as the review goes on. Thank you, Some Dude From North Carolina - Peterpie123rww (talk) 20:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Some Dude From North Carolina: I have made the changes listed – have tried to expand the lead section, do let me know if it should be done more. Thanks! - Peterpie123rww (talk) 21:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.