This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Should the lead have "(stylized as MUSE)" inserted after the album name: "Muse [insert] is the twelfth album by Taiwanese singer Jolin Tsai (蔡依林)."? In ictu oculi (talk) 10:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Badly formed RFC I was called by the 'bot. The RFC is not formed well enough for editors to answer well. It would help if the RFC editor were to offer two or more proposed changes, and also RFCs typically have one or more editors who are debating a proposed change, and the RFC states what the editors' issues are for and against those proposed edits. As it is, this RFC is not formed in the traditional ways. Damotclese (talk) 15:38, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
