Talk:Murder of Katherine Ann Olson

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Justmeherenow in topic WRT the "see also" links at top of article

New page edit

Hi. Please understand that when you create a new page by fission, you must make sure that the new article contains the same data that it had when it was a sub-head on the longer page from which it has been cut-and-pasted. If you have trouble doing this, please communicate via the discussion page with other involved editors and they will help you.

In this case, you replaced a well-sourced article about an ongoing, high profile, current events murder case in which the accused killer is notable for being the first of several accused persons whom the media have dubbed "Craigslist killers" with a one-line redirect.

I rebuilt the page, and i hope that this note will enable you to overcome the problem in your future work here. The real key to getting such moves done right is to communicate with fellow-editors.

Thanks. Your fellow-editor cat yronwode64.142.90.33 (talk) 17:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The page wasn't recreated because it was deleted by consensus of the Wikipedia community twice before you recreated it.[1] I hope that answers your question. Viriditas (talk) 12:20, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

WRT the "see also" links at top of article edit

Discussion moved here (under GFDL license) from Justmeherenow's talkpage:

And this is supposed to reassure me of your good faith? Clearly, you are editing in bad faith. How else can I describe it? Viriditas (talk) 11:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Reply: Note that I myself had created the linked-to article as a replacement for detailed coverage being placed in an article about the accused. (Which, incidentally, I did for WP:BLP purposes.) ↜Just me, here, now 11:44, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • I changed it to point to existing articles instead of an article's sub-section. (That one of them is presently in AfD shouldn't be held against it IMO.) ↜Just me, here, now
OK I see now that a new article was just then created as an alternative to the already existing "List of" article and I'm OK with a link to the new alternative instead. ↜Just me, here, now 16:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply