Talk:Multi-mission radioisotope thermoelectric generator
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Multi-mission radioisotope thermoelectric generator article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Aging already edit
The MSL was originally scheduled for launch in 2009. Perhaps the plutonium dioxide for the 8 GPHS that will be used in each MMRTG has already been made and output is already reducing. Anyone know when the GPHS (to be used) were made ? Rod57 (talk) 14:45, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Ownership edit
While the MMRTGs were initially supplied by Boeing when the program started, they are now supplied by Pratt & Whitney (owned by United Technologies Corporation) due to the sale of the Canoga Park, Ca facility in 2005.
How many watts per MMRTG? edit
This page gives two different values for watts/MMRTG: 2kW, and 125W. What's up? -- 66.31.56.15 (talk) 19:49, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
How many volts per MMRTG? edit
Is there any way to find out how many volts are in those batteries? Presario2200 (talk) 17:28, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
What other missions edit
Are any other missions planned to use the MMRTG ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:40, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
- Looks like nothing is planned after the Mars 2020 rover. BatteryIncluded (talk) 06:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- There are several proposals in the wings for future Discovery-Class missions -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 06:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, there are proposals, not plans. In my opinion, NASA will eventually assign and use the 2 surplus MMRTGs because their radioactivity is continuously decaying and is being wasted. BatteryIncluded (talk) 18:27, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- There are several proposals in the wings for future Discovery-Class missions -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 06:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Multi Mission in the name edit
Article should probably emphasize in intro the significance of 'multi mission' in MMRTG, which is due the fact that it can "can operate both in atmospheres and in vacuum"[1] Ohsin (talk) 03:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
References
- ^ Balint, Tibor. "Comparison of Power System Options Between Future Lunar and Mars Missions" (PDF). sci.esa.int. Retrieved 14 March 2017.
Could try to clarify : Why develop MMRTG rather than use previous design edit
Can we add to this article to explain : Why did NASA develop MMRTG rather than use previous design ? Was it not possible to build/buy more of the old ones, or does the MMRTG have different requirements ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:10, 16 November 2021 (UTC)