Talk:Muhammad: A Prophet for Our Time

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 December 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Criticism edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've removed the section quoting a critic of the book. The body or lead of the article is hardly the place to discuss this as it gives undue weight to arguments against the book. If this section needs to be included then it should be done properly under a separate Criticism section created for it. As it stands this article is a stub and including criticism to an article that barely manages to describe the book is unseasonal and out of place. - 94.1.237.243 (talk) 21:42, 27 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic