Talk:Mowbray College

cleanup

needs reliable sources, neutral point of view, and no original research. ~Eliz81^(C) 09:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Aboutus.jpg

Image:Aboutus.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Image aboutus.jpg

The image currently used as the school's logo is wrong. The image has nothing to do with the college except it advertises for an external rugby website (rugbydump.com). Could someone please fix it back to the original logo, please. Thankyou :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris6225 (talk • contribs) 06:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Workplace bullying

Why is it that each time I write this section of the article it is deleted by Mattinbgn?

At the top of the page it says it needs historical information and this is just that. Also it was well sourced. What is the issue? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.240.178.168 (talk) 08:00, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

The request for historical information is more in relation to the events between the school's founding in the 1980s and the mid-2000s.

The swine flu material was uncited and unsourced, and should not be in the article until reliable, published sources independant of the school can be provided.

However, a reliable source was provided for the accusations of bullying, so I too am curious about the repeated reversions. Even though the article was a deadlink, it is still a valid citation. On the other hand, the content added needs to match the facts described in the source... the addition about the lack of information supplied to parents not covered by reliable published sources, and as such is not appropriate for the article

Missed this comment first time around. The content was removed because it was basically unencyclopedic (and negative) in nature. Problems with staff are routine in schools and it seems nearly every school in Victoria has had cases of swine flu (which is of course, just "the flu" anyway).

I am normally willing to rely on offline sources but given the nature of the content and the seeming ill-will towards the school in evidence from the IP editor (a student?), combined with the fact that most content from The Age is available online, I saw no reason to extend an assumption of good faith in this instance. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 23:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)