Talk:Moviola
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Citations needed edit
I have moved the following to talk since there are no citations to back these "facts" up. Fountains of Bryn Mawr 21:54, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Despite the inefficiency, Moviolas have a few subtle advantages over digital film editing:
* Undoing a cut with a Moviola and film splicer is time-consuming and complicated, thus and editor is liable to be more careful with the cuts he makes.
* Moviola cutting is done with rushes, and under most circumstances only one print of the rushes is ever struck. This makes multiple concurrent versions of a film, created by studio heads, producers, or other third parties to the director, a practical impossibility.
* When cutting on a Moviola, it is impossible to make one-off copies of a version of the film, without sending the work print off to telecine. Thus, it becomes very difficult to pirate a copy of the film out of the editing room.
Hello, everybody, can I suggest that there is no interrelation between a given brand of editing device and the style one evolves ? I think it´s rather the physical presence of film which makes an editor behave differently at work. In reaction to the statements above I´d like to say, editor myself, that of course you can have several prints off a take. That is nothing else what you do in electronic compiling, it´s been here since decades. Naturally film positives will cost more money than digital clones. To close my point here, “inefficiency” is a most respectless word in this respect. The machine is never inefficient, it is man who judges it that way, or: Only a Poor Workman Blames His Tools. --80.219.135.52 17:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC) (Filmtechniker)
Filmmaking??? edit
From the description: This project is an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. How does this article describe a film or film characters? It describes equipment used to edit a film. I think this is the wrong classification. Opinions? Manway 18:23, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- The filmmaking WikiProject has been integrated into WikiProject Films as a task force, which means that the scope of WP Films has expanded to all film topics. I expect the banner will be updated to reflect this shortly. Girolamo Savonarola 18:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for changing the category. I agree it fits better. Please do not erase talk that is not vandalism. Thank you. Manway 22:56, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- New topics go at the bottom. Girolamo Savonarola 22:58, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for changing the category. I agree it fits better. Please do not erase talk that is not vandalism. Thank you. Manway 22:56, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
You're right and I stand corrected. Apologies. Manway 23:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Moviola. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205203729/http://www.city-net.com/~fodder/edit/moviola.html to http://www.city-net.com/~fodder/edit/moviola.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205203729/http://www.city-net.com/~fodder/edit/moviola.html to http://www.city-net.com/~fodder/edit/moviola.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205203729/http://www.city-net.com/~fodder/edit/moviola.html to http://www.city-net.com/~fodder/edit/moviola.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:55, 26 November 2019 (UTC)