Talk:Mount Diablo Silverado Council

Wolfeboro Pioneers - merge

Not notable outside the council; it exists only because the council exists. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk - 14:05, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

• support merge-will this be diligently watched against POV pushers as evinced at the WP article? Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 09:01, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

 Done --—— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk - 18:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, the council website, all literature for the camp and even the local OA lodge does not mention Wolfboro Pioneers. This is an elaborate hoax, right? Something for granddad to regal the kids with what life was like in the good-old-days. Seriously, where are the sources on this group still in existence in 2012. This is fine if history of old camp honor societies to be included in council history. But I have yet to find a source for it's present existence in any form. KeenWh (talk) 05:10, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

There are a number of references on the council website. --— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 14:07, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Not good enough. Reference to gatherings of 60 year old scouters having a reunion or calling a gathering "Wolfeboro Pioneer Days". From the outside, what do we know? If any Scouter from that council has bothered to check this, we have no way of knowing, as nothing has been updated on the page, and if it did, it would be called original research. And I look again, it still a fever dream. There is no source or reason to respond to this nonsense!KeenWh (talk) 07:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

So lets delete Wolfeboro Pioneer from this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KeenWh (talk • contribs) 03:52, 4 March 2016(UTC)

You have an owner? Whatever, you source needs to exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KeenWh (talk • contribs) 03:22, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

What are the sources? Seriously. The Council website has no sources. Maybe, the Wolfbore Pioneers part should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KeenWh (talk • contribs) 07:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you keep making negative comments on the talk page. --evrik ^(talk) 13:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Because there are no sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KeenWh (talk • contribs) 05:51, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

San Francisco Bay Area Council merger

There is an ongoing discussion of a merger with San Francisco Bay Area Council [1] ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 14:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mount Diablo Silverado Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080413075535/http://usscouts.org:80/honorsociety/wolfeboro.asp to http://usscouts.org/honorsociety/wolfeboro.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

The council website has no information on this imaginary society and yet it persists. I wait for honest sources with definitive information. Instead lies like well the tribe of silver marmot existed 60 years ago so therefor it still exists! I wait breathlessly for proof of this nonexistent group! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KeenWh (talk • contribs) 03:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Mount Diablo Silverado Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110202150257/http://elcerritowire.com/history/pages/CampHermsearlyhistory.pdf to http://elcerritowire.com/history/pages/CampHermsearlyhistory.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://usscouts.org/honorsociety/wolfeboro.asp
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://wolfeboropioneers.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721160838/http://www.ironhorsedistrictbsa.org/ to http://www.ironhorsedistrictbsa.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100522181536/http://www.muirdistrict.org/ to http://www.muirdistrict.org/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.silveradobsa.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110202150257/http://elcerritowire.com/history/pages/CampHermsearlyhistory.pdf to http://elcerritowire.com/history/pages/CampHermsearlyhistory.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)