Talk:Mounir el-Motassadeq

Prayer group

Muslims do not have one. :( I never heard of that. We supposed to pray in the mosque that is nearest to our location. Hence if we are at work we pray on different mosque and at home at different place. If we change our home then our prayer location also changes. I think it is much different as compare to Christians. I cannot believe when they put all the people who pray at one mosque terrorist. --- ALM 08:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

The Muslim Brotherhood was organized in groups called usras, which has been translated as "prayer groups," although the word also has connotations meaning "family." So there is a sense in which some political Islamists groups do use such groups, however we translate the words that are used. Hizb-ut-Tahrir uses a similar organizational structure, though in their case the word used is halaqah, which has been translated as "cells."Theonemacduff (talk) 00:30, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mounir el-Motassadeq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110622074334/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2013105029_apeuropeterrorthreat.html to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2013105029_apeuropeterrorthreat.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100807204647/http://www.gpoaccess.gov//911/index.html to http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:45, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mounir el-Motassadeq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040401233653/http://www.unknownnews.net/040206secretjustice.html to http://www.unknownnews.net/040206secretjustice.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mounir el-Motassadeq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040402012805/http://www.unknownnews.net/040305stonewalling.html to http://www.unknownnews.net/040305stonewalling.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://today.reuters.com/tv/videoStory.aspx?storyId=737253aa3a0fbdcef9d4d0a6d429a966555900ec&isSummitStory=False

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

"Alleged" / Page is a mess

Someone seems to have been through the page and stuck a bunch of allegeds, but when you check the link, there's no doubt that these were terrorists, and were involved in the 9/11 attack. It looks like a lame attempt to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the accepted narrative of the attack. Theonemacduff (talk) 00:36, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

I've just done a more detailed reading of the page, and it's a mess. Somebody, or some bodies have been through and thoroughly confused both the narrative and the details so that it's very difficult to follow. There's also an odd paragraph stuck in about a completely different person, and a paragraph (unsourced) which appears to be a quotation from some kind of legal brief from his defence counsel. It's beyond my capacity to fix, but it does need serious attention. Theonemacduff (talk) 00:44, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

I fully agree with you and tried to correct & neutralize the article at least a little bit. Someone here obviously wanted to whitewash a convicted criminal. More work is needed.--Greywin (talk) 11:13, 21 October 2018 (UTC)