Talk:Motorola Single Board Computers

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Pages that links here ?? edit

I tried the "What links here" tool and the first hit was the Motorola 68060 article. I opened it then looked for the link, but no success – there's no such link in the article. Where has it got to? Pkunk (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

How about the good old BCCs ? edit

There is not a single word about the BCCs, such as the 68340 BCC I worked in my early years. As BCC suggests, it is a single board computer (C) the size of a buisness card (BC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.253.170.41 (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Motorola Single Board Computers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply