This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.
Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Why is the majority of the Supreme Court section devoted to pointless politician games? That's what politicians do and its not newsworthy and inappropriate to put on this site due to the content not only being incompatible with the encyclopedia format but also because the insertion of that paragraph tries to turn this site into a tool of a political party.
If generic politician deception is to be treated the same as actual facts, then every politician's page on this site should be at least 99.99% filled up with all the obviously deceptive things they've said or things that have been said about them by other politicians. 2604:2D80:6305:600:1595:C94D:DC4:424E (talk) 16:52, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Is there a good source for info on the oral arguments heard by the court? Who represented the Moores? Who represented the United States? Which justices asked questions? (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 23:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
