Talk:Montgomeryshire (UK Parliament constituency)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)


MP list edit

Two points:

1). I think listing an MP as "independent" in an era before any form of organised party is counter intuitive. Is there a link to something like "pre partisan politics" which might more accurately reflect the situation?

2). I was always under the impression that the seat was a Liberal gain at the 1880 election - certainly everyone expected 1980 to see 100 years of continuous Liberal hold (ignoring Clement Davies) - and forgot to actually campaign! And Charles Watkin Williams-Wynn's 16 years as a Conservative MP doesn't exactly fit "Montgomeryshire has elected Liberal or Liberal-affiliated candidates for centuries", which in any case gets messy as before 1784 (and even afterwards) you get into a mess where almost everyone called themselves a "Whig" and for a time "parties" in Parliament were personality based factions. Timrollpickering 11:32, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Gaps edit

The table contains several gaps (1624-1799, 1850-1863, 1877-1880). Who held the seat in these years? Drutt 19:19, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ok, here is a list of the missing members. Unfortunately it does not state party affiliation, so I'll leave that field blank. Drutt 06:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Too bad, I can't seem to do this without messing up the table. Drutt 07:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wikilinks to MPs edit

Hello, I recently added a 'wikify' tag, asking for wikilinks to be added to the many MPs in this article who lack them. I've been adding in a lot myself, but there's still a lot to do. User:Doktorbuk has twice removed the tag, and gave the reason at User talk:Boleyn as: There's no chance that people are going to start articles - hundreds and hundreds of MPs, often pre-19th century. Your tags are messy, to the point of vandalism, and I will be deleting them ALL.

This seems to be escalating into an edit war, also involving other constituency articles, and I'm hoping to avoid this. My response to Doktobuk was that peopel - including myself - will create articles on pre-19th century MPs. What do others think? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 12:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Different Parliaments edit

Although this may be a UK Parliament constituency now, the list goes back to when the seat was for the Parliament of England. This ceased to exist in 1707 when the Parliament of Great Britain came into being. This again changed in 1801 when the Parliament of the United Kingdom came into being. The list should reflect the change in status of the MPs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.53.105.31 (talk) 21:15, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Montgomeryshire (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply