Talk:Montgomery, Vermont

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Removing information regarding flawed health study edit

The Vermont Dept. of Health now admits that the health study was flawed and inaccurate. So I'm removing that section. As a flawed study, it isn't significant enough to merit mention in this article.

http://healthvermont.gov/enviro/asbestos/vagm-healthstudy.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkwiki (talkcontribs) 11:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Many of the actions taken in history were "wrong" and new ones continue to be. We shouldn't remove it because of that. It upset people for quite some time and the ultimate finding "proves" just the opposite of the accusation and might be raised by any reasonable person reading about asbestos mining that had taken place. It needs to be restored because it answers an important question: Did asbestos mining cause problems in the miner population? Are the tailing remaining today a true threat? Student7 (talk) 21:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
I'd agree with leaving this information in. Use good sources and NPOV and it's fine to keep in there. Jessamyn (talk) 01:53, 24 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Montgomery, Vermont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply