This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to improve coverage of the pseudoscience and subculture of cryptozoology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CryptozoologyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptozoologyTemplate:WikiProject CryptozoologyCryptids articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
The final statement about this mythological creature being 'in reality, a Demon', appears contradictory and inaccurate, as demons are also mythological creatures. Belief in them equates with religious belief, as opposed to facts. The original creature may have been one of many real types of creatures which rumour and superstition then 'inflated' to monster status, but it was certainly not a demon.Limusaurus (talk) 05:42, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
