Stop Removing Bill Alsobrook edit

Whoever keeps removing me from the FPFC Staff needs to stop, and especially stop doing so anonymously. At least sign in so I can send an email to you that validates my edit.Ncfirefighter13 (talk) 08:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)ncfirefighter13Reply

--I added the heading up here just to make sure it is understood who you are talking about. --Oghaffari (talk) 16:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Article Rating edit

The bot had it right - before we got our hands on this page - when it had it rated as a Stub. Now it is completely wrong and I haven't been able to get anyone or any bot to reassess this page. I have changed the class (but not the importance, because that was right) based on the instructions over at the Talk Page for the WikiProject Football/Assessment here. The only reason I didn't rate it a B just because I would like more history or more links to non-MTFC/FPFC sources for the information. If anyone disagrees with my new rating, let's discuss it here. Thanks. --Oghaffari (talk) 16:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Close paraphrasing edit

I was just going through the history section and found similarities with the official website. — Bill william comptonTalk 13:35, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

The officers (and owners, considering the way in which this club is set up) of the team are fully aware and some are even involved in the editing and updating of this page (for example, Bill Alsobrook, the Marketing Manager commented in this Talk page just above you). While I cannot speak on their behalf, I do believe that they have no objection to what we are doing here. What procedures should we follow in order to address your concerns and remove that box from the top of the page? Oghaffari (talk) 14:05, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Oh! I wasn't aware of this fact, but still, you've to show that source material has compatible license with Wikipedia. Please refer this. — Bill william comptonTalk 14:15, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

The easiest way to fix this (and to prove to any doubters that you have permission) is to take the copyright off your web site and replace it with "Creative Commons Share Alike" - that way you are free to copy your own information. Victuallers (talk) 10:05, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Until permission is verified, I'm afraid we must treat this content as though permission has not been given. I will speak to the contributor further at his talk page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:35, 30 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monmouth Town F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:54, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:54, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply