Talk:Moesgaard Museum

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Denmark Mid‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pronunciation? edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Anyone care to indicate how Moesgaard should be pronounced? (i.e. apparently something like American English "moose gore")

Cheers, Erik Anderson 17:18, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I agree, someone should provide a pronunciation for the name.--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 02:57, 13 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I am Danish and lives in Aarhus as well. The pronunciation is a bit like "moose gore" suggested by Erik Anderson. To catch the "oe" in the first part "Moes" more precisely, think of the pronunciation of Roe. It is the same with the "oe". The s is attached afterwards. I guess "Mo-s" sums it up, if you pronounce it quickly in English. Then the "gård" part. It is sometimes spelled "gaard", but the pronunciation is NOT a double "aa". The word means farm in English and the correct pronunciation could be found in a dictionary. It rimes with more, floor, law, saw, tore, sore, lore but the "rd" part has a more abrupt end to it, that I hasn't recognized in English.

So much for my effforts, how do we solve issues like these usually? Shouldn't there be a source or something? How is it usually done? RhinoMind (talk) 13:48, 13 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Moesgaard Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005022024/http://www.nationalmuseet.dk/sw20374.asp to http://www.nationalmuseet.dk/sw20374.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic