Talk:Modeselektor

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Untitled edit

To all contributors: Thank you so much for updating this page from its very measly beginnings!! (Hobmcd 05:31, 25 June 2006 (UTC))Reply

pov edit

This article has a few too many unrestricted adjectives and un-cited quotes. It really needs a cleanup. -- Mikeblas 04:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal edit

The article Hello Mom! is only a track listing without coverage. If it can't be improved, it doesn't deserve an entire article: a copy of the listing in Modeselektor#Discography will do. --M4gnum0n (talk) 11:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I addded some info and references from Allmusic for Hello Mom!, I hope that helps keep the albums as seperate articles. I think they need to be kept seperate so people can find album art for these obscure albums. Amicianthony (talk) 16:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Same goes for Happy Birthday!. --M4gnum0n (talk) 11:57, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Go for it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.107.143.136 (talk) 06:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Doing so takes them out of the Category:Albums by artist tree. Albums MUST be accessible from that tree. So no. Bearcat (talk) 02:51, 12 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
We can't create a page for every nn album only because that category exists. --M4gnum0n (talk) 13:53, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Firstly, if Wikipedia contains information specific to a particular album, that information must always be accessible from that tree. It doesn't mean we have to have an article about every album in existence, certainly, but if we do have an article about a particular album, it needs to be accessible from the albums tree. Secondly, if a notable artist recorded the album, then the album is itself notable by virtue of having been recorded by a notable artist. Notability does not equal "well, I've never heard of it". Bearcat (talk) 00:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree with Bearcat. If i look up Dark Side Of The Moon, i should see an album and data about it, not link to Pink Floyd. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.93.145.85 (talk) 22:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
From WP:NMG#Albums: "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." That means, notability isn't automatically transmitted from artists to albums. And also: "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting." applies here in my opinion. --M4gnum0n (talk) 13:56, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the merge templates as 23 months on, no consensus has been reached. kollision (talk) 12:26, 28 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Name edit

Does anyone know where they came up with the name? That should probably be included at the start of the article.

Also: how to pronounce it? Is it /moʊd.səˈlɛk.tə(r)/ or /mo.de.səˈlɛk.tɔr/? Or something completely different? —Preceding unsigned comment added by James Who (talkcontribs) 05:47, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Mode" means fashion. Or modus. But i don't know if that helps. It's pronounced that way: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcolLdaPPnk --77.21.117.3 (talk) 10:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Modeselektor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply