This article seems overly biased towards Mitch Evans. To an uneducated reader, is presented as the second coming of Michael Schumacher or Ayrton Senna.

Every race win, podium, and point streak is documented in detail, going as far as to illustrate the struggle for him to attain it (ie. combatting food poisoning, starting from the back of the grid, missing races, etc.).

Examples:

- He skipped the second round.... but quickly resumed winning

- In... Sepang... where he had never raced before, Evans was suffering from food poisoning and had handling problems in the first race. But he finished third in the second race and at 18 ... and still a rookie, he became the youngest GP2 driver to stand on the podium.

Way too much detail is put into junior formulae sections, citing specific races, fastest laps, etc. No other driver has this amount of detail, and it is not necessary. Not even Schumacher and Senna.

Also, though there is a lot of information, there are sources present to back it up. However, many links are either expired or just link to a random page (ie. toyotaracing.co.nz). These sources seem biased as well. An example is "BRILLIANT GP2 OPENER FOR MITCH EVANS IN FACE OF ADVERSITY".

Many of these come from New Zealand sites, which could possibly be slanted towards the New Zealand driver. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I Like Pie739 (talkcontribs) 01:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Mitch Evans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 13 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:38, 23 February 2020 (UTC)Reply