Talk:Mississippi Highway 602

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mississippi Highway 602/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TheWombatGuru (talk · contribs) 23:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   Good summary. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

   b (MoS):

   Hancock County, Mississippi, Pearl River County, Mississippi and John C. Stennis Space Center are all three linked two times; the two counties are also linked in the infobox and the major intersections sections. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

   Removed a link for the space center. The other two are okay, AFAIK.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:23, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   Used reliable logs with an additional map. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects):

   Why was the route removed from the state highway system? TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

   Can't find sources for that...can't really interpret more than what's on the map.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 17:56, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   No photographs are present. (photographs of still standing route markers, old photographs if available?) TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

   Pictures of roads in Mississippi (that are useable) are extremely rare...and there aren't any for this one.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:44, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

   Usually they're not required at GA, though we do encourage nominators to try and find some if possible. --Rschen7754 04:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Not really a comment to this article, but the line of text in the Major intersection section could easily be added to Jcttop as it probably appear in a lot of articles in the same grammatical construction. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

This is my first ever review, of course it will need additional reviewers, but I want to learn this stuff, so I thought, let's try it. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

@TheWombatGuru: All issues resolved.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:44, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

@CycloneIsaac: Well, then it looks like a Good Article to me. It probably needs another reviewer though, since this was my first review. TheWombatGuru (talk) 12:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

It seems fine for GA, though it wouldn't progress any further. --Rschen7754 20:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)