 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Untitled] edit
I added his middle name from a "Romania literara" reference.[1]--Mycomp (talk) 02:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
References
- ^ Diaconescu, Ioana. "Deţinutul K 9320: Mircea Vulcănescu" (in Romanian). Romania literara. Retrieved October 27, 2014.
{{cite web}}: line feed character in|title=at position 25 (help)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mircea Vulcănescu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924123630/http://www.romaniaculturala.ro/articol.php?cod=7466 to http://www.romaniaculturala.ro/articol.php?cod=7466
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
POV edit
Vulcanescu's active participation in drafting antisemitic policies is not even mentioned. There are academic sources available (e.g. Deletant) furthermore none of the recent articles including interviews of historians was used. I feel like the article is biased in favor of Vulcanescu. Plinul cel tanar (talk) 18:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- https://www.rfi.ro/politica-151869-de-ce-nu-trebuie-sa-aiba-mircea-vulcanescu-bust-istoric-vulcanescu-personal
- https://santinela.net/2022/09/16/ambasada-rusiei-la-bucuresti-are-dreptate-cu-privire-la-goga-vulcanescu-si-gyr-toti-trei-au-fost-fascisti/
- https://santinela.net/2022/09/20/de-ce-irita-mentionarea-trecutului-fascist-al-romaniei-o-posibila-explicatie/
- https://www.vice.com/ro/article/pad9qm/mircea-vulcanescu-antisemit-istorie-scandaluri
- Yup, on one hand, he was a sophisticated philosopher, a keen sociologist, and had the reputation of behaving like a saint, on the other hand, he became the Adolf Eichmann of Romania. tgeorgescu (talk) 05:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- I see this comparison with Eichmann, which is out of proportions. Does participating in government sessions and thus knowing the topics of conversations re Jews make him a person comparable to Eichmann? Is there something similar to the Final Solution to have been carried out by the subject of the article, to justify the comparison? (I've just encountered this page and I'm surprised by these statements/comparisons.)--178.138.32.206 (talk) 13:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- What exactly is the active participation in drafting antisemitic policies mentioned above? I think it should be clearly stated. (Just participating in government talks is something rather passive, not active)--178.138.32.206 (talk) 13:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- We do not make the call, WP:RS make the call. Wikipedia isn't for ventilating our own opinions (yours or mine). tgeorgescu (talk) 19:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Whitewashing edit
Whitewashing should be treated with WP:NONAZIS blocks. See [1]. tgeorgescu (talk) 11:12, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- I also see this allegation of whitewashing. It is something very subjective. On the contrary it seems that someone is keen on making accusations which do not hold. If someone does not agree with some comparisons, could this be labeled as whitewashing? I'm just asking, I haven't any biases, pro or con to the subject of the article.--178.138.32.206 (talk) 13:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- If you think it's subjective you should not edit Wikipedia. tgeorgescu (talk) 20:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)