Talk:Minor Passions characters

Regarding attempted page removal/merge of Precious (Passions character)

Merged from Talk:Precious (Passions character) — TAnthony^Talk 06:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Although Precious was a minor character, perhaps ironically, she is probably the most significant character in the entire Passions universe as far as attracting real-world attention independent of the show, fans, etc. No less than the famous Jane Goodall commented on her, so by Wikipedia standards, I can't possibly see why she wouldn't deserve her own page. -- Dougie WII (talk) 09:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

The notability of the character certainly makes her deserving of inclusion in Wikipedia, but doesn't necessarily mean she needs an individual article (and I will also note, the Emmy nomination stuff is also included in the main Passions article). To me, the length of the material determines that; this is barely more than a stub, and even if expanded I can't imagine there is really enough more to say about Precious to make a decent-sized article. Inclusion in Minor Passions characters doesn't minimize the character's importance, and actually improves the notability/impact of the Minor characters article itself. In any case, this material should not be in both places; I added the missing image to the "Minor characters" article, but won't redirect this again for now, thinking we may get some more input. And for the record, I'm the one who added the Emmy nomination stuff to this article in the first place, so I share your impression of the character's notability. — TAnthony^Talk 21:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Ok, well these points do make a lot sense to me. I guess I no longer oppose this per se, but I think more care has to be taken such that all information is preserved. -- Dougie WII (talk) 03:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

I've restored the redirect and added the new Jane Goodall link here. Precious can always be broken out again should the need arise. — TAnthony^Talk 06:14, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Charlie

I don't think an alter ego of a character should be listed separately, as Valerie Davis was merged into Vincent Clarkson when it was revealed they were the same person, so I think this section shouldn't exist on this page. It appears that all information is already contained in Alistair Crane#Charlie. -- Dougie WII (talk) 12:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I concur. Everything about Charlie in this article is already included in the Alistair Crane article. — Spanish lullaby (talk) 15:34, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Looks like no one is opposing this, so I'll remove the section tomorrow. -- Dougie WII (talk) 01:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Toto and the Little Angel Girl

Is Toto really the Little Angel Girl? I wasn't watching during that time...If so, perhaps those two sections should be merged. -- Dougie WII (talk) 19:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I have no idea... I had just started watching, and I don't remember it at all. I couldn't find anything on SoapCentral, either. — Spanish lullaby (talk) 21:04, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Syd and Kelly

Are Syd and Kelly the same person? I know that they were played by the same actress, but I was under the impression that Reyes was a Law & Order-style repeat offender. — Spanish lullaby (talk) 21:04, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Excess of "minor" characters?

Just a thought — are all of the characters on this list really necessary? People like Juanita and Edna and Norma definitely need to be mentioned here, but people like Stuart Allen, Tina Alvarez, Carmelita, and Elena? Referring to them as "minor" overestimates their importance — they had extremely small roles that had little to no impact on the storylines. This page seems cluttered to me with all of these one-time, non-notable characters, and if no one opposes, I'd like to go ahead and remove them all. — Spanish lullaby (talk) 00:00, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minor Passions characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080207091019/http://tvmegasite.net:8080/day/passions/transcripts/older/2006/pass-trans-06-13-06.shtml to http://www.tvmegasite.net:8080/day/passions/transcripts/older/2006/pass-trans-06-13-06.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed merge of List of Passions characters with Minor Passions characters

Seems like an uncommon duplication of essentially the same topic. "Minor Passions' characters" would most likely fail WP:LISTN. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

• Support a merge into the main list. There is no need for a "minor characters" list – how would that even be defined without sourcing that describes each and every one as a categorically "minor character"? – Meena • 09:07, 7 September 2022 (UTC)