Talk:Minister for Water (New South Wales)

Australia: New South Wales / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Minister for Water (New South Wales) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 20 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Minister for Lands and Property to Minister for Water (New South Wales). The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 20 April 2023 edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments4 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. As proposed. No opposition to a move has been raised after a month. There appears to be no firm consensus on the best article title, so this closer has picked one using WP:CONCISE. WP:NOTCURRENTTITLE applies: As this result does not indicate a consensus for the chosen title, anyone who objects to the closer's decision may make another move request at any time...instead of taking the closure to move review. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:31, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

– There is no need for a second article on the Lands Minister. The Water Ministry, currently covered in the Lands and Property article, can be expanded to be the focus of the second article. DilatoryRevolution (talk) 05:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 18:09, 29 April 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. EggRoll97 ^(talk) 23:05, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Support but retain (New South Wales) on all/any articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:07, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I disagree with retaining the brackets. I'd prefer to keep the Lands article at "Minister for Lands (New South Wales)" than move it to "Minister for Lands and Property (New South Wales)." That's unnecessarily long and the disambiguation does not add value because there is no article from which to disambiguate it. --DilatoryRevolution (talk) 01:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Since this has been stalled for nearly a month, I (a relister) support no parentheses per WP:CONCISE. ClydeFranklin (talk) 02:17, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic