Talk:Minefields in Croatia/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 09:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC) I'll do this one. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 09:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Copy edited as part of review
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	OK
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	OK
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	OK
	2c. it contains no original research.	OK
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	OK
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	OK
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	OK
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	OK
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	OK
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	OK
	7. Overall assessment.	Comments addressed and copy edit completed. Well done.

Comments

• both "Croatia" and "Non-governmental organisations" have duplicate links
  • Removed overlinking.
• there is a problem with three citations and two refs. The cites are "Index.hr 27 July 2005", "HCR Donations" and "tportal.hr 7 September 2011", the refs are "Flauder" and "Policija". Looks like the wrong date for at least two of them.
  • The two refs indeed were disconnected from two cites due to wrong dates placed at one end or the other, and the third cite is fixed through addition of an accidentally omitted ref.
    • Now there are problems with two more refs, "Vukovar potpuno..." and "Plan humanitarnog..." - no citations are pointing to them.
      • Oops. The two were used to support the table moved to the List of minefields in Croatia - removed as redundant.
• one checklinks came up blue per [1]
  • That's the second EL to the minefield GIS data portal. I get the same (blue) result, but the link works fine. I suspect the blue message is returned because the initial webpage of the site requires a user input - agreeing to terms and conditions.
• no alt text on images (not a GA requirement)
• all other toolbox checks are green
• numbers 1-9 should be in words throughout per MOS
  • Spelled out.
• suggest you pull out the table and create List of minefields in Croatia then use a main template at the top of that section
• have commenced a copyedit, about halfway through. Will finish up tomorrow. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 12:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for taking time to review the article. I like the idea about the list being pulled out - I expect to have that completed today.--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
    • A pleasure. Reminded me of several (fortunately marked) minefields inside the Zagreb airport perimeter in 1995. Promoting. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 05:03, 3 May 2013 (UTC)