Talk:Millinery Center Synagogue
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This page appears to have recently become the fulcrum of an edit war between the old rabbi and the board of the synagogue. Asking for help from neutral parties.66.65.34.135 (talk) 03:15, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- As shown here, the board did appoint a new rabbi. They would obviously like the page to list the new rabbi and president, and they also don't wish the page to badmouth anyone involved. Please help. 66.65.34.135 (talk) 03:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 14 June 2017 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to request a change in the false documentation of the this page. The current Rabbi is Rabbi Hayim S. Wahrman. The new Rabbi and the new president of Reminick is false as they dont have any supporting documents that proves they were made rabbi and president. They mention Board of Trustees but they dont actually have any! I have a court docs that shows winning a court case which appointed me otherwise. Please take this down and put up the correct info that was there for many years until these people started changing it around a few months ago. I love everybody (talk) 05:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Reliable source that the rabbi appointed in 1994 is still rabbi and nothing is changed.
http://www.leagle.com/decision/19951238163Misc2d1075_11068/HOLLER%20v.%20GOLDBERG
- How does a case from 1995 prove a new rabbi wasn't appointed in 2016? 66.65.34.135 (talk) 08:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Editors should be aware that a large amount of material was recently oversighted on this page and a user oversight blocked. That doesn't mean that edit requests can't be granted, but be very careful that edits do not contain any defamatory material. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC).
Not done: Above comments indicate that there is no consensus for the requested edit, and the requester has not provided a reliable source to verify the claim made. —KuyaBriBriTalk 13:55, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
- Editors should be aware that a large amount of material was recently oversighted on this page and a user oversight blocked. That doesn't mean that edit requests can't be granted, but be very careful that edits do not contain any defamatory material. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC).
