Talk:Milford, New Hampshire

Merge discussion

Please see the WikiProject New Hampshire talk page for background on the proposed merge of the Milford CDP article with this article. --Ken Gallager (talk) 20:04, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Major employers

I removed it because it's a spam magnet. I could see a statement about the *largest* employer in town, but listing a POV list of "major employers" is just leaving the article open for every mom-&-pop operation that wants to be listed. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 00:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, I think there are enough wikipedia editors who know Milford to remove them. Spam magnets exist all over wikipedia; we can hardly leave out everything that might be one. I think this is a reasonable tidbit. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 01:36, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

David, seriously. How many editors do you think "know Milford"? And why exactly is "Cirtronics" notable enough to include in a Wikipedia article? And how many other towns or cities in NH list any companies on their articles? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 01:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Cirtronics has 185 employees, according to its Web site, which puts it right up there with Hitchiner/Hendrix. Other NH towns which have a large number of jobs relative to their population like Milford should have such information, since it's more relevant to life (albeit more difficult to ascertain from a distance) than some other information we provide on town sites. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 11:23, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Just to throw my two cents in, I lived in Milford for several years, and of the companies you just mentioned, I've only heard of Hitchiner. Shrillpicc100 (talk) 01:14, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Milford, New Hampshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to https://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224003647/http://www.cabinet.com/cp/cabinet/ to http://www.cabinet.com/cp/cabinet
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080211224151/http://www.wildnh.com/Inside_FandG/hatcheries_visitor_centers.htm to http://www.wildnh.com/Inside_FandG/hatcheries_visitor_centers.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:27, 31 January 2018 (UTC)