Talk:Miles: The New Miles Davis Quintet

Fair use rationale for Image:Miles Davis New Miles Davis Quintet.png edit

 

Image:Miles Davis New Miles Davis Quintet.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

______________________________________________________

re the Prestige contract:

according to Miles' autobiography, the jan 1951 contract was for one year, which was why he was able to make those records for Blue Note in 1952/53/54. (see pg 140)

after he quit heroin in 1954 Weinstock signed him to a new three year contract, starting with the Miles Davis Quartet (Blue Haze) album (see pg 175), that would be the one he was still obliged to when he signed w Columbia

J Edward Malone (talk) 19:35, 17 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

______________________________________________________