Talk:Mikoyan-Gurevich Ye-150 family

Unnamed section

HELP!! I can't get the specification template to work. Is it faulty on the template page:- Template:Aircraft specs? Or have i done something stupid (usually the case)!Petebutt (talk) 13:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

D"OUBLR HELP!! It is the page. i transferred an obsolete spec template from SEPECAT Jaguar, which showed up ok, but when I put the data in for the Ye-150 it went to text only with no html formatting.Petebutt (talk) 14:20, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Citations

There's three books listed in the references, but the article is only cited to one of them...? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Yes, but correct me if I'm wrong, (probably the case), books listed in a bibliography do not have to be cited in the article.216.241.36.83 (talk) 20:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

If they are not used as a reference they should be in further reading i believe. MilborneOne (talk) 20:23, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Semantics, i thought that is what Bibliography is supposed to be.Petebutt (talk) 19:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Not as used here on Wikipedia. 'Bibliography' is the full citations for the footnotes. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 21:07, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

FixedPetebutt (talk) 20:43, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Peer review

I have asked for peer review because I would like to bring this article up to B-class, at least, but the latest reviewer has not indicated what might be required (other than the obvious of course)Petebutt (talk) 20:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Rather than develop this article further can we investigate merging it with Mikoyan-Gurevich Ye-152 as all these aircraft had the same origins and were merely variants of a single design, it seems to be the right way forward, "less is more" (sometimes)Petebutt (talk) 18:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

I have done the merge and it seems ok. If there are major problems it can always be reverted. Please carry on with the review, but I will be writing a better description section for the article over the next few days/weeksPetebutt (talk) 20:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Mach 2.8?

3030km/h isn't Mach 2.8, it a little over Mach 2.4. I've seen at least one website claim Mach 2.51, but in any case I don't think Mach 2.8+ is accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larboard3 (talk • contribs) 02:36, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mikoyan-Gurevich Ye-150 family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060824041628/http://www.armscontrol.ru/atmtc/Arms_systems/Avia/Russia/MiG_Aircraft.htm to http://www.armscontrol.ru/atmtc/arms_systems/avia/russia/MiG_Aircraft.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)