Talk:Miguel Zenón

Latest comment: 10 years ago by 80.176.158.190

This article is way too long and reads like a press release. It needs serious work by an objective editor. Languagehat (talk) 18:11, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

    • I've deleted the biography. It was word for word copied from the Miguel Zenon website. Full of hype and promotional language. The IP who pasted it contribution history shows only edits for Miguel Zenon. If there was ever a case for putting a COI template on a WIKI article this is it. It's a shame because Miguel is a phenomenal musician, and deserves a proper article, but WIKI is not an extension of an artist's personal website. Do not re-paste this website biography. I'm adding a COI template as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.158.190 (talk) 16:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
    • I've added the COI and Advert template to this article and have done the above because it is clear that the IP (who has only ever edited this article) who put this article up mistakenly thinks WIKI is an extension of an Artist's promotional machine. The biography (that I have deleted) was a direct copy of artist website biography (see above). There are no independent references in the article at all. There is a exhaustive list of non notable albums mentioned with no independent sources at all; however, they have made a section about album reviews, which I have never seen on WIKI before. The album reviews should be used as inline citations to source their corresponding albums. There is no reason to list album reviews on their own, this is highly promotional in nature. Miguel Zenon definitely deserves a WIKI entry but this page needs to start fresh. My vote: delete the content and start over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.158.190 (talk) 16:27, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply