Talk:Miguel H. Díaz

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Sexual harassment alegations edit

I think the content should be kept because it is relevant, and has reliable sources. Weegeerunner (talk) 17:53, 17 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Just a drive-by comment as this edit was flagged up as potential vandalism in the Recent Changes feed. I completely agree with the unsigned-in user that its removal from the lead is valid. This is too much sordid detail for an intro paragraph. Whether it is appropriate to include it later within the article, I'll leave you folks to discuss as I don't propose to get involved in further discussions on this. Nick Moyes (talk) 01:04, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Miguel H. Díaz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:24, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply