Talk:Microsoft Software Updater

Unsolicited merger.

Someone has merged this page without consensus earlier, if it's presented that "the info is similar" then the information should be exactly the same, as this page also includes information for 2 distinct applications and more detailed information this page has a right to exist as it's notable enough, is more detailed and thus not copy-pasta information, and is a subject that will expand upon in the future as it's an ongoing supported piece of software, if anyone is for the merger please respond and I will respond to your arguments and see who's right. Sincerely, --86.81.201.94 (talk) 18:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Also the user who made this page a redirect didn't know what a proper merger is, merging a page means moving the content from one page to another, as this page contains too detailed information for the Microsoft Mobile page I'd highly advise against it, further the Nokia Software Recovery Tool and the Windows Phone Software Recovery tool content hasn't been moved and isn't mentioned in the Microsoft Mobile article, in fact the who deletion of this article was based on nothing but the editor's opinion and they haven't made any arguments to support it yet.

Sincerely, --86.81.201.94 (talk) 19:41, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Has anyone discussed this with the person who moved this page? <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 23:39, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Yep, the person's only justification was that the introduction was too similar to the introduction on the Microsoft Mobile page, and should therefor be merged, completely ignoring the Nokia Software Recovery Tool, Lumia Software Recovery Tool, and Windows Phone Recovery Tool sections which are unique to this page, or the fact that the content here is more detailed, but I've dealt with this editor before, they have done this before, this happened to a HERE Maps related article that was blanked and redirected despite almost none of the content being in the main article, I had to restore it and move it manually, I guess that some people are just simply deletionist, anyhow if no pro merger statements are made by Monday I'll remove the template.

Sincerely, --86.81.201.94 (talk) 09:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Microsoft Software Updater. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150418152112/http://www.punchng.com/business/technology/nokia-opens-six-care-centres-in-nigeria/ to http://www.punchng.com/business/technology/nokia-opens-six-care-centres-in-nigeria/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)