Talk:Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio

Critique

The Pave Link failed in notable application and by this i recognize that PAVE allready went away from MRDS. Look at http://pave.princeton.edu/about/projects/prospect12 for Software and MRDS. I would like to put a critique section within the article but lacks in lecture skills. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.163.146.179 (talk) 13:58, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Player Project

Player Project has its own wikipedia page, so information about player project belongs there, including external links. An entry in the see also section is more appropriate pcr^talk 03:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

It is relevant the good and bad thing of an article topic, for a NPOV. I.e. Esperanto, Biodiesel, Ethanol fuel and so on. One can do it in two ways. Include a criticism section or include a link to other robotics suites (the concurrency it is basic for full NPOV - i.e. see cars topics-). --Altermike 06:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Can you rephrase this in plain english please, I am having great difficulty following your argument. pcr^talk 00:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

A lot of articles includes criticism to the different topics and because of this, they are neutral. Non-neutrality would be not include the criticism to the article. (have you seen any article of the mentioned?)--Altermike 17:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Logo

The logo programming language has no direct relevance to Microsoft Robotics Studio. While Microsoft Visual Programming Language, as a dataflow language has some similarities to functional programming languages like logo, and while robotic turtles have been used in robotics education, there is not currently any work that I am aware of that makes this relevant pcr^talk 03:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

As in Player Project, one can include this in the criticism section (as in other products, it forgets this traditional and easy to use robotic language ) or as a link. --Altermike 06:55, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

License

The License is listed as CTP, but Microsoft has a specific page on it with terms: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/robotics/bb332140.aspx. Should there be a link to this somewhere, or on the CTP page maybe? 68.163.238.177 01:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes, if that is the CTP it should be linked to on the CTP page. If it isn't the CTP, this article should be changed so the license name is correct and the link added here. NicM 08:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC).

Supported Robots

I believe we should broaden this category to be "Supported Hardware" so that it can also include sensor systems and robotic components instead of entire mobile robots. Also, should we designate between supported hardware that ships with MSRS like the fischertechnik, and supported 3rd party hardware like the CoroBot? --- BAxelrod (talk) 03:51, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

References section link number 3: http://pave.princeton.edu/about/projects/prospect12 is no longer valid or is a dead link — Preceding unsigned comment added by No1kilo (talk • contribs) 21:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Microsoft Robotics Developer Studio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120303002620/http://www.parallax.com/eddie to http://www.parallax.com/eddie/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110210120350/http://arobotineveryhome.com/ to http://www.arobotineveryhome.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110923174409/http://www.parallax.com/eddie to http://www.parallax.com/eddie
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.segway.com/rmp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100209111632/http://www.surveyor.com/SRV_info.html to http://www.surveyor.com/SRV_info.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.robodynamics.com/roombadevtools
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091228034104/http://www-robotics.cs.umass.edu/Robots/UBot-5 to http://www-robotics.cs.umass.edu/Robots/UBot-5
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216024846/http://www.zmp.co.jp/e-nuvo/en/index.html to http://www.zmp.co.jp/e-nuvo/en/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070922084213/http://www.conscious-robots.com/en/robotics-studio/index.php to http://www.conscious-robots.com/en/robotics-studio/index.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071123112403/http://simplysim.net/ to http://www.simplysim.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)