Talk:Michigan Limestone and Chemical Company/Archive 1

Archive 1

2nd Opinion

This review has languished for one reason or another. It was nominated on 24 March for Second Opinion by an IP address. IP addresses can't do nominations. The IP address has not been active since 24 March. Nonetheless, we can take this for a second opinion.--Whiteguru (talk) 22:30, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Michigan Limestone and Chemical Company/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: JPxG (talk · contribs) 12:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)


  • Sure, why not. I'll do my best!
  • @JPxG: Please take your time in doing the review. I broke my shoulder and had to have surgery. I won' be able to respond to any issues for 3 weeks. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 16:25, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
If you would like to put forward the review before then, I can take over and address your points, JPxG. — The Most Comfortable Chair 16:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
@Doug Coldwell: Oh shit! I am sorry to hear that. I wish you a pleasant and relaxing recovery! jp×g 22:37, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
@The Most Comfortable Chair: Thanks for the offer. jp×g 22:37, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
@JPxG: I'm ready to take the review now. Thanks. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:53, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
@JPxG: I'm ready to take the review now. Thanks. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 15:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

20 days ago. I pray for forgiveness. Okay, let's get crackin'. jp×g 06:14, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

@JPxG: You are forgiven. Look forward to the review.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
@JPxG: It will be nice to see the review. I'll start resolving the issues immediately. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:11, 8 March 2022 (UTC)


Starts 2nd Opinion. The review will follow the same sections of the Article.   Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 22:39, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

 


This review is transcluded from Talk:Michigan Limestone and Chemical Company/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Observations

  * HTML document size: 122 kB
  * Prose size (including all HTML code): 20 kB
  * References (including all HTML code): 23 kB
  * Wiki text: 22 kB
  * Prose size (text only): 11 kB (1912 words) "readable prose size"
  * References (text only): 3796 B
  * Article meets WP:SIZERULE 
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  • Lede is a good, terse summary.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  • redlink to railroad ballast might profitably go to track ballast
  • redlink to mine dusting might profitably go to Rockdust
  • Reference 24 goes to 404. Archive version found here
  • Reference 29 does not particularly go anywhere.
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  • History section is well referenced.
  • Uses section is appropriately comprehensive
  • Self-unloading ships of the company is an important inclusion.
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  • NPOV is presented in this article.
  1. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  • Page created 9 May 2008
  • Page has 135 edits by 57 editors and 15 anonymous editors
  • Majority of edits in 2021 = 53
  • 90 day page views = 1,118
  • Page is considered stable
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  • File:Michigan Limestone and Chemical quarry.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.
  • Bradley, Carl and W. F. White at Calcite, 1919.jpg = fair use public domain claimed, first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
  • File:First shovel and locomotive 6-6-1911.jpg = fair use public domain claimed, first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
  • File:Trains, Crusher, Screen House, Powerhouse 5-8-1914.jpg = fair use public domain claimed, first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
  • File:Original MLCC Main Office at Calcite 8-6-1918.jpg = fair use public domain claimed, first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
  • File:Opening of 42-inch crusher 5-7-1912.jpg = fair use public domain claimed, first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
  • File:Calcite, Launch Day - March 30, 1912, Wyandotte.jpg = fair use public domain claimed, first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
  • File:Bradley Unloading in Hopper 1958.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license
  • File:Quarry Limestone marker.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license
  • Fair use rationales accepted.  
  1. Overall:
  • Redlinks are not show stoppers but merit correction.
  • Two references can be repaired.
  • Micketti is used comprehensively. AGF here as it is not accessible on Google Books.
  • Generally, a well written, interesting article as limestone has many, important uses. --Whiteguru (talk) 02:30, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

  Passed