Talk:Michael O. Fitzgerald

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:01, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Michael Oren FitzgeraldMichael Fitzgerald — The page should be moved to Michael Fitzgerald, instead of Michael Oren Fitzgerald, as "Oren" is Fitzgerald's middle name, and therefore, titling the article Michael Oren Fitzgerald is incorrect.Stephenbloomington (talk) 03:00, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Delete as vanity page; his webpage, from which this is plagiarized, calls him Michael Fitzgerald. If kept, therefore, move to the shorter form; the middle name is not incorrect, but does not appear to be common usage. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    AfD filed. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:58, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Unsure why this would be accused of being a vanity page. All of the information stated is public domain and factual, that is widely sourced from various news articles and websites. As to it being copied from World Wisdom.com, said website is Fitzgerald's publisher, and therefore, posts biographical information its author. Worldwisdom.com is cited as a source in the links. Stephenbloomington (talk) 01:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
The idea that a publisher would write neutrally and impartially about his list was a joke 200 years ago; it is less than that now. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:43, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Even accepting that point, the information that is sourced from Worldwisdom.com is a small portion of the material in the article. I have also inserted a reference from a Peer Reviewed journal "Sacred Web" which would meet Wikipedia's definition of a reliable source. Regardless, there are nine other references from various sources which verify that the information contained in the article is accurate.Stephenbloomington (talk) 14:14, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
To cite [[1]], "Published authors are kept as notable if they have received multiple independent reviews of or awards for their work".Stephenbloomington (talk) 14:39, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Michael O. Fitzgerald. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:11, 10 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Michael O. Fitzgerald. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:58, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply