Talk:Michael Lynch (geneticist)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Heidilynnmichael, Emscott3. Peer reviewers: Emscott3, Danielle Adelaide.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Untitled edit

I am no expert, but I don't think "The Origins of Genome Architecture" is a textbook. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.195.200.161 (talk) 23:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello.. So what's your opinion on the "Tree of life" and "Flower of life" show the metaphorical depictions of the the DNA and the energy we label loosly as a soul. Do you see the complex nature of such evolved mechanics of biological Evolution of these concepts. Just curious Michael Lee Namaste CHAARM (talk) 19:05, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Emscott3 peer review edit

What looks good: you have a strong background to begin with; mentioning his alma mater, books he has written, and awards he has written gives a good sense of his accomplishments.

What to expand on: next try adding information on his research and any field studies or journals associated with his findings. In addition, you could consider adding more information on his life and his newer accomplishments (if any) now since the only information available on the page right now is from over 30 years ago Emscott3 (talk) 02:56, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sections need removal edit

This article contained promotional unreferenced material. It still does. The sections related to the research should present secondary sources or be removed. Discussions and descriptions of Lynch's primary papers do not belong to BLPs.DeWeerth (talk) 16:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Block evasion edit

Just a note that recent unreverted edits by Lelandykes were block evasion by a sockpuppet of Arifer. This would normally be reverted per WP:BE but since it means restoring material where WP:ONUS matters, independent editors should assess what should be restored if anything. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 22:51, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply