Talk:Michael J. Skindell

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 108.200.160.156 in topic Controversy section is editorialized

Untitled edit

This is a newsworthy item and deserves to remain on the webpage of Representative Skindell.

Do you mean on the Wiki? Brookie :) - a collector of little round things! (Talk!) 19:35, 14 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

This page has been cleared of copyright vios and reverted to a former correct version. PaulKreder (talk) 16:55, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Edit request from 76.250.190.255, 3 October 2011 edit

no longer on judiciary criminal justice. http://archives.legislature.state.oh.us/JournalText129/SJ-09-27-11.pdf

76.250.190.255 (talk) 17:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 20:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael J. Skindell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Controversy section is editorialized edit

The following sentence is editorializing Mr. Skindell's stance on film tax credits, rather than reporting facts about his legislative actions: "Studies at the time and since have found film tax credits’ fiscal and job benefits are negligible." 108.200.160.156 (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply