| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
State bar records
editTX's state bar has a database that includes disbarred attorneys; I've linked to Murphy's entry since it's the most authoritative source of data on TX disbarments. LA's state bar online appears to list only "active" lawyers, so no link. rewinn 20:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
About other scandals
editThis article is not about other officers. There may be some relevance to the fact that the Murphy scandal comes at around the time of other scandals involving other Air Force officers, but details about those other scandals should go on those other officers' pages. rewinn 17:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- That being said: a reference to another scandal was deleted with the reason given being that the other officer was not a JAG; however, the article did not assert that the other officer's a JAG, only that the other officer was a high Air Force officer, like the subject of the article. This may or may not be noteworthy; I've restored the content (accurately, and in its own section) and leave it for others to discuss its noteworthiness. rewinn 16:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Sources required
editAn anonymous editor is trying to add information without providing sources, and in addition it consists largely of commentary. You can't do that, because wikipedia is not a blog. Why not simply PROVIDE a source for the additions, and refrain from the commentary. rewinn (talk) 16:21, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Michael D. Murphy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061231104657/http://www.texasbar.com:80/template.cfm?section=member_directory to http://www.texasbar.com/Template.cfm?Section=Member_Directory&template=/Customsource/MemberDirectory/MemberDirectoryDetail.cfm&ContactID=225902
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:11, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
WHMO
editI'm curious why the White House Military Office refused to release him from his NDA. Is there by any chance any information about that? Little of what the WHMO does would seem to require secrecy, especially after the fact, and as legal counsel he presumably did not know the kinds of operational details that they might want to keep secret. Why they would not want him to be able to talk about his duties and disclose his evaluations is unclear to me.Bill (talk) 06:14, 16 June 2024 (UTC)