Talk:Michael Beetham
 | A fact from Michael Beetham appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 January 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Battle of Britain edit
Note vandalism in line 1 of para 2. Also, evidently wrong dates in second part of 'Post-war career' 86.129.158.248 17:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Lengthy bold edit
Personally, I dislike lengthy bold sections. At the moment, the lead section has a lengthy bold section as if to suggest that this man's entire career needs bolding or something. Are others annoyed by this like I am? -- 70.231.142.200 17:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Michael beethman modern.jpg edit
Image:Michael beethman modern.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Michael Beetham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110812152044/http://www.rafweb.org/Records.htm to http://www.rafweb.org/Records.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120704044828/http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/london/friends/history.cfm to http://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/london/friends/history.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 27 November 2017 (UTC)