Talk:Mexico and weapons of mass destruction

CONE

Exactly what is "CONE"? It linked to the disambiguation page at AEM, but that's obviously wrong. The space agency is at Agencia Espacial Mexicana. This still doesn't tell anyone what CONE is. Is what is meant, the "Comisión Nacional del Espacio Exterior" (CONEE) ? 65.95.13.213 (talk) 05:50, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved Consensus is against the move at this time. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 17:36, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

---

Mexico and weapons of mass destruction → Mexico and nuclear weapons — This article only covers nuclear weapons, it does not cover other weapons of mass destruction, such as chemical or biological weapons. A more specific title would be better 65.95.13.213 (talk) 05:54, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Oppose - there is a convention amongst articles on this topic to use (state) and weapons of mass destruction - Shatter Resistance (talk) 07:46, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose - As per Shatter Resistance, this article name is a conventional form used by all of the other articles about countries and their current or past nuclear programs. AlexCovarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 16:00, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

To change the name of this article would create a whole new precedent for renaming a whole series of articles on weapons of mass destruction. It would make more sense for IP to go out and find out about any programs that Mexico may have had in other mass destruction areas and add to the article. Shatter Resistance (talk) 07:46, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Do you think that a redirect should exist from my proposed title, then? 65.95.13.213 (talk) 07:44, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

No, it just complicates the issue. Shatter Resistance (talk) 08:17, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Rather more important is to actually find some reliable source references that actually refer to a Mexican nuclear programme and back up what this article says - ref 2 and 5 are used to claim that Mexico had sucessfully produced weapons grade Uranium in 1974 - both cites link to the front page of ININ, which appears to say no such thing. Ref 10, from the IAEA is used to suggest that Mexican military may still have nuclear weapons and that the Mexican Army maintains oversight over a reasearch reactor - again it says no such thing. I haven't checked the Youtube videos which are being used to support the claim that Mexican space research rockets were to be used to launch nuclear warheads - however the summary for the viseos indicates that it is a news piece about the Mexican space programme and does not mention nuclear weapons. As the whole of this article is well into Wikipedia:REDFLAG territory, very strong sources are required to support the key claims, and as far as I can tell, it does not have such sources.Nigel Ish (talk) 22:29, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Seriously, what is this?

In the present form, this article is nothing but a pile of unsupported statements and some random sources that do not back the arguments at all (like the videos!).
There is at least one of such claims in each line... but my favourite was is the closing one that "the Mexican Army still maintains oversight of the nuclear activities, so it can still build nuclear weapons!!!" The source for this: an article wrote in 1986. WOOOOOOW!

Would be wonderful if the author could *actually* provide some evidence. Yet I suspect it is wheter a conspirationist, or just a kid. My condolences to those that actually used this in their homeworks.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajusco (talk • contribs) 15:50, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Agreed that as it stands, this article's principal claims are completely unsourced, and as I said in the move discussion last year, the claims are sich that they require extremly good sourcing - otherwise this article should probably be deleted.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:25, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

I agree Nick-D (talk) 08:30, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

"Mexico is one of the few countries which has technical capabilities to manufacture nuclear weapons.[1]" The citation does not support the claim. Lewis Goudy (talk) 00:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mexico and weapons of mass destruction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110430200457/http://www.opanal.org/opanal/Tlatelolco/Tlatelolco-i.htm to http://www.opanal.org/opanal/Tlatelolco/Tlatelolco-i.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mexico and weapons of mass destruction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130218175517/http://mexico.usembassy.gov/press-releases/ambassador-wayne-praises-mexicos-efforts-to--prevent-the-spread-of-nuclear-weapons-and-technology.html to http://mexico.usembassy.gov/press-releases/ambassador-wayne-praises-mexicos-efforts-to--prevent-the-spread-of-nuclear-weapons-and-technology.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:47, 27 January 2018 (UTC)