Talk:Mexican jumping bean

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 108.202.33.17 in topic Soaking vs submerging?

plural edit

Move to Mexican jumping bean from the plural?

  • Oppose. Plural feels right in this case. How often does one ever talk about just one bean? Dragons flight 00:46, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support. In line with naming conventions. violet/riga (t) 20:22, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. violet/riga (t) 20:22, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Soaking vs submerging? edit

Under the “care” section, what's the difference between soaking and submerging? dude1818 (talk) 23:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Agreed, what does this mean? WilliamKF (talk) 21:09, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Submerging is immersion to a depth greater than the height of the bean. 208.48.154.67 (talk) 18:31, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

What does "care" mean in this context? Most of the article is about beans with the moth larva. Wouldn't soaking or submerging kill the larva? Is this "care" for beans without the larva? If they are not generally eaten, what then is the purpose? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.202.33.17 (talk) 17:50, 8 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Flea or moth edit

The first paragraph mentions "They are a seed pod through which the larva of a small flea has chewed." Then later it mentions "while the Jumping Bean Moth (Cydia deshaisiana) is a member of the large genus Cydia."

The rest of the article mentions Moths, so I assume flea should be changed to moth. But, I am not an entomologist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.22.172.173 (talk) 15:59, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Intent? edit

The opening paragraph states, "The beans are considered non-toxic, but are not intended to be eaten." Intended by whom? Are we suggesting that the edibility of a plant is the result of a conscious decision? Ron2112 (talk) 19:07, 17 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mexican jumping bean. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:22, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply