Talk:Metropolitan Council (Minnesota)

Minnesota Mid‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Urban studies and planning Start‑class

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On 31 January 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Metropolitan Council to Metropolitan Council (Minnesota). The result of the discussion was moved.

Important Article edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

OK so MN Project ranked it mid but I think the Met Council is pretty darn important. The work they do is underneath what most people know or see and cities on the fringe are at the mercy of the Met Council's decision to service them or not. Tho I can see where today MC doesn't have nearly as much power as in the past since its politically appointed. Anyway, I'll be doing more to improve this article but I thought I'd note attention to it..:DavuMaya:. 17:00, 21 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Metropolitan Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:54, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 31 January 2024 edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago6 comments6 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 16:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

– I don't see evidence that the Minnesotan council is the primary topic for the title over all the others. Only the first two results of my google searches relate to it (and one of those is this article) with the other hits on the first page being related to different councils (e.g. Kirklees Metropolitan Council features prominently). All the entries on the disambiguation page (and all the other councils that could also be listed there if it was a complete list of all Metropolitan councils, e.g. West Yorkshire Metropolitan Council, Delhi Metropolitan Council, Seoul Metropolitan Council) use an uppercase "C" so the disambiguation should be at the base title with that capitalisation. Thryduulf (talk) 16:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Support even from England the Minnesota council comes up first though the rest of the results are for the English councils. However the Minnesota one has 512 views but Metropolitan Council of Nashville and Davidson County has 368[[1]] which seems close enough especially given all the others without separate articles and the generic meanings per WP:DIFFCAPS. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support. There is no reason why this generic term should go solely to the entity in Minnesota. Kablammo (talk) 12:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. No primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Support for the reasons above. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 20:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic