Talk:Meteorological history of Hurricane Luis

Comments from a copyeditor

• When Tropical Depression Thirteen strengthened into Tropical Storm Luis on August 29, it marked the earliest date on which the twelfth named storm of any season formed, surpassing the previous record set by Tropical Storm Twelve of the 1933 season. - Storm #12 wasn't a named storm, though I can't think of any other way to word this at the moment. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

• Continual wind shear prevented significant organization, as convection was displaced from the center of circulation. - This would be nearly impossible for a casual reader to comprehend. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:55, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

• With a Category 4 hurricane forecast to track directly over the Leeward Islands, Hurricane Warnings were issued for several islands by September 4. - I don't believe "Hurricane Warnings" should be capitalized; thoughts? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:05, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

• Operationally, the NHC briefly downgraded Luis to a Category 3 hurricane as it passed through the islands due to the formation of concentric eyewalls;[21] however, in post-season analysis, it was determined that the storm never weakened below Category 4 status while passing through the Leeward Islands. - Pretty clunky, though I don't feel competent to try to dissect this sentence. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:08, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

• The second paragraph of the lead is a bit choppy, so you might want to look into this. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:24, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Meteorological history of Hurricane Luis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments:

1. The storm originated from an area of low pressure associated with a tropical wave. <-- Yeah, uh, when?
2. ...with a well-defined 46 mi- (74 km) wide eye <-- fix convert/whatever there (don't need the hyphen)
3. I would suggest removing the place names from the headers for consistency.
4. Add a piece of records to the lead.
5. Wikilink Greenland.
6. Split second paragraph of the Bermuda/dissipation section.
7. Find a better image than File:Hurricane Luis on September 6 1995.png.

After this, i am going to put it on hold for fixing.Mitch/HC32 20:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Meteorological history of Hurricane Luis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061025150435/http://www.atl.ec.gc.ca/weather/hurricane/storm95.html to http://www.atl.ec.gc.ca/weather/hurricane/storm95.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061025150435/http://www.atl.ec.gc.ca/weather/hurricane/storm95.html to http://www.atl.ec.gc.ca/weather/hurricane/storm95.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 22 May 2017 (UTC)