This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Central America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Central AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Central AmericaCentral America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I added this page today. I would like to integrate it into the project mesoamerica but don't know how. Also I would appreciate if someone looked it through and expanded it. --Maunus 18:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hey thanks, Maunus, this looks to be a really good start. To integrate an article into the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, you simply need to add the Project's banner template {{WP Mesoamerica}} to the top of the article's talk page. Assessments could also be marked at that time by use of the template's class and importance parameters, see this page for guideline instructions on the parameter values and assessment criteria. Or alternatively, these can be omitted and the article will be marked as 'unassessed', one of the project members will come along later to assess it.--cjllw | TALK 02:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was already moved by kwami. --regentspark (comment) 20:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
But you just moved it here? Why didn't you just move it to the non-cap title right away? Or leave it where it was, since there's not really any compelling evidence that "langauge area" is more commonly used than "linguistic area", and standardization in itself isn't a reason. ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 16:51, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As it stands this article is good as far as it goes but it is just a summary of the seminal Campbell et al. article it references. I think it would be worth adding a section explaining how the theory has been received by subsequent scholars, to what extent it is currently accepted, and what criticism it has received, or objections have been made, what discussions it has given rise to if any, or other proposals have been considered. Perhaps this could all go into a section titled "Criticism". A R King (talk) 23:10, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
E.g. Suárez (1983) disputed the position held by Campbell et al. on pp. 159ff. A R King (talk) 23:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
