Talk:Merchants of Doubt/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 23:41, 12 November 2011 (UTC) I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:43, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Prose is good, lead good, articke complies sufficiently with WP:MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Well referenced to WP:RS, no evidence of WP:OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Thorough, without trivia

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Suitably licensed, caption not required for cover in infobox

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I find no problems with this article so am happy to list it. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 02:26, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing. Much appreciated! Johnfos (talk) 23:29, 13 November 2011 (UTC)