 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
I added a bit on Nishida which could be reworked. For the tradition and history of philosophy it seems highly unfortunate to leave some connection to the Kyoto School out of Meontology as they were the leading authorities on non-being. Nishida also shares similarities to those mentioned who contributed both to ontology and meontology so it seems an easy extension. Euanthes 02:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
cleanup edit
I've reduced a lot of the prose in the article. Other than the claims about "nothingness" only being an Eastern concept (which are highly dubious) and some comparisons to Hegel that don't sound much like Hegel, most of the information conveyed by the article is still there. It's just said more succinctly. It's cited well for how much text is there so I'm removing the original research temmplate. Unclear to me what "narrate the coming-to-pass of the Infinite in the ethical relation" means. Possibly it does not mean anything, but I through a clarify tag in case anyone wants to take a stab at it. - car chasm (talk) 00:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)