Talk:Melbourne School of Continental Philosophy

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Australia: Melbourne / Education Low‑importance

	Australia portal Melbourne School of Continental Philosophy is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Philosophy: Continental / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Continental philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Since the wikipedia notice went up describing this entry as an advertisement, I have made a number of changes to it. First and foremost, I have added references from third party, verifiable sources, to ground the claims made in the article; secondly, I have tidied up the writing style in an attempt to bring it in line with wikipedia's standards.

Between these two changes, I hope that the problem is moving towards a resolution. By adding substantial references I hope to ground the claims which might otherwise be viewed as subjective. If there are still problems with the article, I would like to know how I can get feedback from a wikipedia editor. Cheers. Prdaniels 14:34, 22 July 2007 (UTC)prdanielsReply

comment edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have decline to delete the article, as it seems primarily descriptive. I have removed some further programmatic statements. I have also removed some of what I consider excessive tagging, as normally WP accepts the official website for uncontroversial internal history. If any of the statements are actually controversial, they should be discussed on this talk page. DGG (talk) 18:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic