Talk:Medusa (The X-Files)

Medusa (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Medusa (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 8) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 13, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
July 26, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage / The X-Files Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Medusa (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 19:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Plot

"Moving ahead, the team, finds", remove comma between team and finds
'orgonizing' and 'involvedment' are spelling errors

Production

"Reportedly, because of the scope of the episode, a "huge budget" was allotted for the entry." needs a ref

Footnotes

Be consistent with the ref date format: Is it February 11, 2001 or 11 February 2001

Otherwise happy to pass this. On hold. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 19:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Alright, I believe I've addressed all the issues. Thank you for the review.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:15, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic