This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This page contains lists of data that were removed from McDonnell Douglas Phantom in UK service during the editorial process prior to potential submission for FA status. I collaborated with another editor during this process, and we reached a consensus that having this data in the article itself was not required. However, I felt that it was important to retain it for readers to look at, should they desire to do so. As a result, I set up User:Hammersfan/McDonnell Douglas Phantom in UK service - data as a place for the data to be retained, which could then be linked to via the article itself, in the manner of publishing data sets alongside a scientific journal article. I was THEN told that I should not utilise a sandbox link in a published page, so I transferred the data to a new published page. Again, I am happy to take advice on how this page could be improved, but I am unhappy at the idea that a page should be put up for deletion because it is "unusual". Hammersfan (talk) 10:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
.svg){kind=small}