 | This article was nominated for deletion on 8 February 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Laurie Ferguson. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maureen Walsh is not to be confused with ... edit
... Maureen Walsh, English singer (see here and there). --Kolya (talk) 12:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2019 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change:
In 2019, she argued against the right of nurses to have uninterrupted lunches and rest breaks, claiming that nurses "...probably play cards for a considerable amount of the day." [8] The Washington State Nurses Association denounced her statements as "incredibly disrespectful and patronizing."[9]
To:
In 2019, she argued that a bill to ensure the right of nurses to have uninterrupted lunches and rest breaks should be amended to exclude critical access hospitals that serve less populated areas, claiming that nurses at that type of hospital "...probably play cards for a considerable amount of the day." [8] The Washington State Nurses Association denounced her statements as "incredibly disrespectful and patronizing."[9] 73.97.106.80 (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
Imbecile? edit
I didn't know that Wikipedia accepts and publishes opinions now. They may be correct, but they have lost a ton of credibility here. ANVIL9267 (talk) 21:05, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- I reverted the edit. Thanks for reporting! S0091 (talk) 21:10, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- It's called vandalism. It happens. No, wiki has not lost "a ton of credibility" for allowing an insult to a very minor state politician to stand for a few minutes. Don't be ridiculous. 199.247.46.138 (talk) 04:08, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- I think they were referring to the editor who made the edit as the article is semi-protected for this reason. However, don't forget WP:GF, just because someone got upset about a sensational topic and made an edit in the heat of emotion doesn't mean there a bad person or a bad editor. Frapsity (talk) 07:04, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
- Wikipedia has been contaminated by liberal ideology and has become a little bit like an MSM outlet these days by deliberately leaving controversial opinions open for discussion. This name-calling behavior should never made it past the first draft.
Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2019 edit
Shame on wikipedia for describing this sitting senator as an imbecile. Whether she is or not is immaterial. This is supposed to be a neutral site to get non biased information. Not the opinion of any author. 184.90.45.100 (talk) 21:11, 20 April 2019 (UTC)