Talk:Maureen G. Mulvaney

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Problems with the article edit

Hello. While I have at least some faith in the subject's notability, this article is written in a promotional tone and editors who have participated in creating this article may have COI. This article also needs third party sources, not just the subject's homepage. Zakhalesh (talk) 17:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've fixed some of this myself but there's still a plenty of problems. For example, the sections about the books seem to be... I don't know the word for it, but if they were fictional books, it would be "in-universe". That is, they focus on describing what the books say as facts, which isn't good for style and for people that actually want to know about the books, not just a short excerpt of the book's theme. Publication dates, sales, reception would be acceptable if the individual books are notable - otherwise, a simple listing will do, and a single section in the article would cover the literary career. Zakhalesh (talk) 04:13, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Maureen G. Mulvaney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply